Fetterman Advocates For Trump's Pardon After Biden's Action On Son
Last week, Senator Fetterman shared his views on ABC's "The View," expressing that both the cases involving Hunter Biden and Donald Trump were tainted by political motivations. He suggested that the nature of these cases undermines public confidence in judicial institutions.
Fetterman emphasized the need for pardons in both cases to restore trust and to deter future misuse of judicial power for political gains. His comments came shortly after President Biden issued a pardon to his own son, Hunter Biden.
He stated, "The Trump hush money and Hunter Biden cases were both bulls‑‑‑, and pardons are appropriate," underscoring his stance on the matter.
Reactions From Political Figures And The Public
The controversial stance has stirred discussions on the politicization of legal cases. New York Governor Kathy Hochul, who has the authority to pardon Trump, has yet to comment on the possibility, and her history of strained relations with Trump suggests a pardon is unlikely.
Meanwhile, Representative Dean Phillips, a Democrat and Biden's primary challenger in the 2024 election has echoed Fetterman's calls for a pardon. Despite his critical view of Trump, Phillips supports a pardon in the interest of national unity.
Phillips described Trump as "a serial liar, cheater, and philanderer, a six-time declarer of corporate bankruptcy, an instigator of insurrection, and a convicted felon who thrives on portraying himself as a victim." Yet, he still believes a pardon would serve the greater good.
Media and Legal Commentary on Fetterman's Stance
The Hill has reached out to Governor Hochul's press office, the Manhattan district attorney's office, and the Department of Justice seeking comments on Fetterman's statement and the potential for a pardon.
Legal experts debate the implications of such high-profile pardons, discussing how they might affect future political and judicial proceedings. The response from these offices could significantly influence public opinion and political dynamics.
Fetterman further stated, "Weaponizing the judiciary for blatant, partisan gain diminishes the collective faith in our institutions and sows further division," highlighting the broader implications of his proposal.
Broadening The Debate On Judiciary's Role In Politics
As the debate unfolds, the comparison between the Trump and Hunter Biden cases continues to draw attention. Fetterman argues that both situations represent a dangerous precedent for political interference in legal processes.
"I think that it’s undeniable that the case against Hunter Biden was really politically motivated, but I also think it’s true that the trial in New York for Trump was political as well, too," Fetterman shared during his television appearance.
His advocacy for pardons in both cases underscores his broader concern about the erosion of trust in American judicial and political institutions.
Fetterman's Advocacy Reflects Larger Political Divisions
The senator's push for pardons has not only highlighted existing political rifts but also prompted discussions on the potential for reconciliation through unusual legal measures such as pardons.
As the story develops, the political community and the general public remain split on the appropriateness of such pardons, especially in cases perceived as heavily politicized.
Fetterman concludes, "In both cases, I think a pardon is appropriate and I really think, collectively, that America’s confidence in these types of institutions have been damaged by these kinds of cases, and we cannot allow these types of institutions to be weaponized against our political opponents," calling for a reassessment of the political use of legal tools.
