Federal judge tosses GOP challenge to Nevada's mail-ballot counting rules

Republicans have been fighting against the low-security voting methods that America's liberals have been eagerly deploying each election cycle.

For those hoping for an immediate improvement in Nevada, you're going to be waiting at least a little while longer.

It makes sense that a lot of attention is being paid to a battleground state like Nevada as the 2024 Election approaches.

This very well may be one of the most important elections in America's history, so it's crucial that America feels as if we can trust the results we're fed after the ballots are tallied.

Republicans are concerned about liberals possibly counting votes after the polls closed or allowing ballots to come in after the deadline. In 2020, it just so happened that almost every single instance of votes being counted in circumstances like this leaned Democrat.

Maybe liberal voters prefer unconventional methods... or just maybe, the people counting the ballots were liberals who had their fingers on the scale.

Federal District Court Chief Judge Miranda Du, a Barack Obama appointee, did not see things that way.

She thought that the current rules in Nevada were good enough, and they allow the inclusion of mail-in ballots even if they are not received before or on Election Day.

Republicans are arguing that allowing ballots to be counted after the official submission deadline opens up all sorts of possibilities for corruption.

Liberals don't see it that way, as they want all the wiggle room they can get to make the presidential election as unconventional as possible.

"The Nevada mail ballot receipt deadline does not have an ‘individual and personal’ effect on the voting power of Republican voters; it neither undermines their access to the polls nor disproportionately diminishes the weight of their votes relative to other Nevada voters," Du said as she was rejected the Republicans' case.

What do you think about this decision? Should we make our elections as secure as possible, or should we open up avenues a little bit to make sure it is easy for everyone to vote in a way that's convenient for them?

If you are interested in learning more about the details of this story, please feel free to click on the primary source here.