‘Democrat Megadonor Claims Harris’ Lavish Spending Shows She’s Unfit For Future Campaigns’

Vice President Kamala Harris faced fierce criticism from a leading Democratic donor over her 2024 presidential campaign's extravagant expenditure.

The campaign's nearly $1.5 billion spending has sparked concerns over the financial sustainability of the Democratic Party and raised doubts about Harris' future in politics.

Vice President Kamala Harris officially launched her presidential bid on July 21, setting the stage for what would become one of the most expensive campaigns in history. In total, Harris and the Democratic Party allocated close to $1.5 billion towards her presidential endeavor.

High Campaign Costs Lead to Internal Criticism

Despite the significant financial investment, the campaign did not yield the desired results. Harris lost the election, a result that has led to severe scrutiny over her management capabilities. Democratic megadonor John Morgan voiced his disappointment on the television show “CUOMO,” commenting on the excessive spending and the eventual electoral defeat.

Morgan criticized the campaign's financial strategy, suggesting that the high expenses did not translate into success. He remarked, “A lot of people got rich on the back of donors trying to stop Trump. And I think this disqualifies her forever. Forever. If you can’t run a campaign, you can’t run America. And that would be the argument just on day one. So it was terrible.”

Impact on the Democratic National Committee

The financial repercussions of the campaign's lavish spending have also affected the Democratic National Committee (DNC). There were allegations that the DNC was facing potential significant debt due to its financial backing of Harris, leading to the firing of hundreds of its employees. However, Patrick Stauffer, the Harris campaign’s chief financial officer, contested these claims.

Stauffer assured that as of Election Day, the DNC did not have any outstanding debts or bills overdue. This statement was aimed at mitigating concerns about the financial aftermath of the campaign's spending.

Analysts Question Harris’ Viability as a Presidential Candidate

Political analysts have also weighed in on Harris' capabilities following the campaign. Mark Halperin, a political analyst, questioned her suitability for the presidential role, highlighting her track record of poor performances in two presidential runs. He suggested that it was crucial for both the media and the Democratic Party to reevaluate her potential for future political roles.

Despite the criticism, Harris is reportedly considering her next political moves. Sources close to her have indicated that she might be eyeing a presidential run in 2028 or a gubernatorial bid in California in 2026.

Future Political Plans Under Scrutiny

John Morgan's blunt assessment of Cuomo’s show reflects a broader skepticism within certain segments of the Democratic Party regarding Harris' future. “Look, I think she did a good job in the debate. I think she did as good a job as you could hope for in a short period of time,” Morgan said, acknowledging her debate performance despite his overall criticism.

He further expressed his concerns about her political viability. “I told you, I told everybody, she should not have been the nominee. She was not going to win. And she didn’t win and she lost badly. So she’s got to go figure out her life … She’s having a call with donors this week, they tell me, about her political future. I don’t think she has a political future,” he concluded.

Discussion of Harris’ Campaign Spending Continues

Chris Cuomo also highlighted the broader implications of Harris' campaign spending on the show, questioning “how bad” the spending has been for the future of the Democratic Party. This ongoing discussion points to a crucial moment of reflection for the party as it considers the outcomes of its investment decisions.

As the Democratic Party and Harris navigate the repercussions of the 2024 presidential campaign, the debate over financial prudence and political strategy continues to unfold, with significant implications for the party’s future direction and Harris' role within it.