Bragg requests new date for congressional testimony

Well well, would you look at that.

Another liberal who can't keep his word.

This time, it's Alvin Bragg.

After Donald Trump was convicted of 34 felonies in New York, Republicans in Congress obviously had some questions.

There was little to no evidence supporting the prosecution, and their two star witnesses were exposed to be complete liars during their time on the stand.

Still, liberals somehow found a way to get a guilty conviction, and Bragg proudly boasted that he would cooperate with any investigation into the trial to PROVE that it was done on the level.

Unsurprisingly, Bragg is going back on his word.

He's trying to cover by saying that sure, he'll talk EVENTUALLY, but not right now.

It's no coincidence that liberals want the facts of this trial concealed until after Donald Trump receives his sentence.

Bragg's office conveniently cited "scheduling conflicts" as the reason why Bragg wasn't going to be able to talk to lawmakers on the originally scheduled date of June 13.

That's perhaps the biggest joke I've ever heard. What scheduled events could Bragg possible have on his agenda that would be more important than the trial of the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Bragg's office released a memo saying that Brag might cooperate eventually, he's just not going to right now:

"That cooperation includes making the District Attorney available to provide testimony on behalf of the Office at an agreed-upon date, and evaluating the propriety of allowing an Assistant District Attorney to testify publicly about an active prosecution to which he is assigned," officials said.

"However, the proposed date that the Subcommittee selected without consulting the Office presents various scheduling conflicts," the memo concluded.

That's liberal speak for "we know Bragg agreed to be interviewed, but now we don't want that to happen."

To read more about this story, click on the source here.