Twenty-four states' attorneys general order Supreme Court to take up transgenders in sports case

The Supreme Court isn't told what to do very often, but the cries of attorneys general from 24 states have become too loud to ignore.

Attorneys general from 24 states are demanding that America's Supreme Court overturn a lower court ruling and uphold an Arizona law that would prohibit biological boys from competing on girls' sports teams.

This is one of the issues that conservatives sometimes have a hard time understanding.

Whether you are a "boy" or a "girl" is defined by whether you are born with a penis or a vagina, not by your "feelings."

It's simply not fair to the girls wanting to play sports that they should have to compete against males, who are on average, faster and stronger than females.

If LeBron James decided he wanted to go to the WNBA and average 100 points a game in a wig, people would NOT be okay with that.

So why are liberals willing to put females in danger when they are only high school students?

It's one of the things that Democrats have never been able to properly explain. We know it's just because they are pandering to the mentally ill under the guise of "inclusion" to pander for votes.

"Sports teams are divided by sex to begin with to give girls a level playing field so they’re not competing against boys," said South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson. "Arizona’s law restricting girls’ sports teams to biological females is just common sense, and it protects girls from competing against bigger, stronger males who identify as females."

The attorneys general added in their brief, "In sports, equal access means a level playing field, and a level playing field usually means sports teams divided by sex so that girls can compete against other girls."

"Basing the distinction on biology rather than gender identity makes sense because it is the differences in biology—not gender identity—that call for separate teams in the first place: Whatever their gender identity, biological males are, on average, stronger and faster than biological females. If those average physical differences did not matter, there would be no need to segregate sports teams at all," they continued.

Hopefully the Supreme Court will "make it clear that the Constitution does not prohibit states from saving women’s sports from unfair competition and providing meaningful athletic opportunities for girls and women."

If you are interested in learning more about this story, please feel free to click on the original source here!